In accordance with the scheme for National Pension System (NPS), as notified vide Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs)’s Notification No. 5/7/2003-ECB & PR dated 22.12.2003, the System is mandatory for all new recruits to the Central Government service (except armed forces) from 01.01.2004. Accordingly, as per Rule 2 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, as amended on 30.12.2003, these rules are applicable to Government servants appointed to civil posts on or before 31.12.2003. The date on which the vacancies arose or the date on which the examination was conducted for filling up the vacancies is not relevant for deciding the applicability of the Central Civil Services (Pension) rules, 1972.
Ministry of Home Affairs have not sought any advice from Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare on the question of having a policy to cover the paramilitary personnel appointed after 01.01.2004 under the Old Pension Scheme on the ground that the vacancies arose, or the examination was conducted, in the year 2003. However, a reference was received from Ministry of Home Affairs in a specific case relating to appointments as Sub-Inspector in various Central Para Military Forces after selection in August, 2003 on the basis of an Examination conducted in 2002. Appointments on the basis of these selections were made in Central Reserve Police Force in 2003 and the candidates appointed were covered by the pension scheme under Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972. However, in the Border Security Force, offers of appointment on the basis of the same examination/selection were issued in January, 2004. On a petition filed by some personnel appointed in the Border Security Force on the basis of that examination, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi directed to cover the petitioners under the Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 on the grounds of administrative delay on the part of Border Security Force in making appointments. The order of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi was implemented by the Ministry of Home Affairs/Border Security Force in view of the peculiar circumstances of that case. The decision taken in that case is, however, not relevant for deciding applicability of Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules to all appointments made on or after 01.01.2004 in the Central Para Military Forces or in any other Department/organization on the basis of year of examination/selection.
This information was provided by the Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) Development of North-Eastern Region (DoNER), MoS PMO, Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Atomic Energy and Space, DrJitendra Singh in written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.
Source:http://www.pib.nic.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1539258
Popular
Label List
- -BONUS ORDER
- 'BONUS
- AICPIN
- AIDEF
- AIR INDIA
- AIRF
- AITUC
- ALLOWANCE
- annual increment
- ARMY
- BANK EMPLOYEES
- BSNL
- cadre restructuring
- cadre review
- CBSE
- cgda
- CGHS
- CHILD CARE LEAVE
- children education allowance
- CONFEDERATION
- DA
- DC JCM
- DEARNESS ALLOWANCE
- dearness relief
- DOPT
- EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND
- EPFO
- FAMILY PENSION
- finmin
- FIXED MEDICAL ALLOWANCE
- GDS
- GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND
- GPF
- GRADE PAY
- HOLIDAY
- HOLIDAY HOMES
- HOUSE BUILDING ADVANCE
- HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE
- HRA
- INCOMETAX
- JCM
- JCM III
- KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA
- LEAVE TRAVEL CONCESSION
- LTC
- LTC 80 FARE
- LTC ADVANCE
- MACP
- MATERNITY LEAVE
- MAY DAY
- MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
- MINISTRY OF FINANCE
- MODIFIED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION
- NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE
- NATIONAL PENSION SCHEME
- NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM
- NC JCM
- NEW PENSION SCHEME
- NIGHT DUTY ALLOWANCE
- NJCA
- OFB
- one rank one pension
- ONE RANK ONE PENSION.
- ORDINANCE FACTORY BOARD
- paternity leave
- pay fixation
- PCDA
- PENSION
- post offices
- POSTAL EMPLOYEES
- RAILWAY BOARD
- RAILWAY BONUS
- RAILWAY EMPLOYEES
- retirement
- retirement age
- revision of pension
- VRS
- WOMEN EMPLOYEES
Follow by Email
DISCLAIMER
The contents and information given in this blog are purely informative in nature and should not under any circumstances be taken as authority. All efforts had been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this (www.centralgovernmentemployees.com) blog. The same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. centralgovernmentemployees.com accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant departments and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. We cannot guarantee the availability linked pages at all times.
Post a Comment