Pension products from the life insurance stable should also be included in the 80 CCD(2) window in line with NPS to qualify for additional tax deduction .
Life insurance: An attempt to build a pensioned society through only the National Pension System (NPS) is a good strategy but this approach should be widened to include other pension products to make it more attractive by removing the service tax from all pension products and not just NPS.
One of the key budgetary announcements this year from an insurance perspective was to bring down service tax on single premium annuities from 3.5% to 1.4%. This certainly will bring down the cost of such policies, the benefits of which can be enjoyed by life insurance customers.
Service Tax Parity
An attempt to build a pensioned society through only the National Pension System (NPS) is a good strategy but this approach should be widened to include other pension products to make it more attractive by removing the service tax from all pension products and not just NPS.
The Finance Minister has brought about disparity between the life insurance pension products and other pension products like NPS and EPF. In the absence of a widespread social security system in the country, the life insurance sector can play a critical role in building a pensioned society through its vast reach and having over 30 crore existing customers. Given the substantial reach of Insurance companies, the agenda of future social and financial security can be quickly implemented by leveraging the existing insurance base.
It would not be out of place to request for a similar service tax treatment in line with NPS. This can go a long way in supplementing the Government’s intent to promote pension and annuity across the nation.
There is therefore a strong case for the removal of the service tax component from all IRDAI approved life insurers who provide pension and annuity products in line with the NPS.
Special Tax Deduction limit for all pension plans.
Investments in NPS have been given a special tax deduction of up to Rs 50,000 under section 80 CC(D) of the Income Tax Act, which puts it at a vantage position in comparison to pension products in the life insurance sector. The Finance Minister should consider including all pension products and not just NPS in this exclusive limit of tax exemption.
Pension products from the life insurance stable should also be included in the 80 CCD(2) window in line with NPS to qualify for additional tax deduction . In the same vein, annuitants who receive the annuity income in their advanced years should also be able to receive tax free income in their hands.
Level playing in tax free withdrawal limit
There is a further regulatory gap with regards to the Life Insurance plans and the NPS. As per the budgetary announcements, 40% of the corpus of NPS will be exempted from tax obligations. The corresponding amount with regards to pension products of the life insurance sector stands at 33% as per IRDAI regulations. Pension products of this sector should be brought at par with the NPS by making 40% of the corpus tax free.
Separated tax limit for protection and long-term savings products
Finally, in a country that is short of social security and has a crying need to ensure protection and financial inclusion of its countrymen, there is a need for life insurance to be given its due importance as an instrument that can achieve public policy goals. Hence, we do believe that a separate window over and above Section 80C of the Income Tax Act should be created to the tune of Rs 1.5 lakh for protection and long-term saving instruments. Alternatively, a separate window for pure life risk policies, akin to health insurance, should be created.
In addition, the current regulation allows tax deduction only in cases where sum assured is 10 times that of annual premium. This puts additional cost burden on people in higher age bracket. It would be a good idea to align Income Tax regulations to IRDAI product regulations which allow minimum sum assured multiple of 7x in case life insured is above 45 years of age. Or Income Tax regulations may totally do away with sum assured multiple requirement and tax exemption criteria could simply be the policy tenure of 10 years or more.
Life Insurance industry can play a critical role in creating a secure and pensioned society. It is time the Finance minister gives a boost to the industry by providing tax benefits.
The author is senior director and chief financial officer, Max Life Insurance
Read at http://www.financialexpress.com/article/personal-finance/life-insurance-needs-to-be-treated-at-par-with-nps-to-achieve-public-policy-goals/267644/
Popular
Label List
- -BONUS ORDER
- 'BONUS
- AICPIN
- AIDEF
- AIR INDIA
- AIRF
- AITUC
- ALLOWANCE
- annual increment
- ARMY
- BANK EMPLOYEES
- BSNL
- cadre restructuring
- cadre review
- CBSE
- cgda
- CGHS
- CHILD CARE LEAVE
- children education allowance
- CONFEDERATION
- DA
- DC JCM
- DEARNESS ALLOWANCE
- dearness relief
- DOPT
- EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND
- EPFO
- FAMILY PENSION
- finmin
- FIXED MEDICAL ALLOWANCE
- GDS
- GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND
- GPF
- GRADE PAY
- HOLIDAY
- HOLIDAY HOMES
- HOUSE BUILDING ADVANCE
- HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE
- HRA
- INCOMETAX
- JCM
- JCM III
- KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA
- LEAVE TRAVEL CONCESSION
- LTC
- LTC 80 FARE
- LTC ADVANCE
- MACP
- MATERNITY LEAVE
- MAY DAY
- MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
- MINISTRY OF FINANCE
- MODIFIED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION
- NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE
- NATIONAL PENSION SCHEME
- NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM
- NC JCM
- NEW PENSION SCHEME
- NIGHT DUTY ALLOWANCE
- NJCA
- OFB
- one rank one pension
- ONE RANK ONE PENSION.
- ORDINANCE FACTORY BOARD
- paternity leave
- pay fixation
- PCDA
- PENSION
- post offices
- POSTAL EMPLOYEES
- RAILWAY BOARD
- RAILWAY BONUS
- RAILWAY EMPLOYEES
- retirement
- retirement age
- revision of pension
- VRS
- WOMEN EMPLOYEES
Follow by Email
DISCLAIMER
The contents and information given in this blog are purely informative in nature and should not under any circumstances be taken as authority. All efforts had been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this (www.centralgovernmentemployees.com) blog. The same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. centralgovernmentemployees.com accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant departments and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. We cannot guarantee the availability linked pages at all times.
Post a Comment