In view of the fact that review Petition filed by UOI RP (C) NO. 2565/2015 in SLP (C) No. 6567/2015 UOI Vs M.O. Inasu dismissed by HSC on 28.8.2015, and Following file notings of DOPW (obtained under RTI)let us hope DOP&PW will now issue necessary instructions extending benefit of full min. pension to all pre 2006 pensioners irrespective of Q.S. rendered.
The extract from the File Noting obtained from DOP&PW under RTI ACT, on pro rata pension matter.
Extract from File Noting of DOP&PW OM 30.7.2015 obtained under RTIA:
12. It may be mentioned that in its order dated 22.1.2013 and 16.8.2013 in OA No. 715/2012 and OA No. 1015/2012 respectively, Hon’ CAT Ernakulam Bench directed that the revised pension fixed in terms of para 4.2 of OM dt. 1.9.2008 would not be reduced pro rata in cases where the qualifying service of a pre 2006 pensioner was less than 33 yrs. This order of Hon CAT was challenged by D/o Revenue in the H.C. of Kerala in OP(CAT) No. 4/2012 and No. 8/2012. Hon’ H.C. of Kerala dismissed the Op(CAT) No. 4/2012 and No. 8/2012 vide order dt. 7.1.2014. The SLP filed by the Dept. of Revenue against the order dt. 7.1.2014 has also been dismissed by Hon’ S/C. in its order dated 20.2.2015. Learned ASG, Sjri P.S.Narsimha has advised to file a Review Petition. The concerned file is presently with MOL(CA Section) and Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv. is drafting the RP.
13. As already mentioned above, in the order dt. 29.4.2013 of Hon HC of Delhi in WP No. 1535/2012, it was observed that the only issue which survived was, with ref. to para 9 of OM dt. 28.1.2013 which makes it applicable from 24.9.2012 instead of 1.1.2006. In view of this observation of the Hon H.C. of Delhi, we may issue orders for giving effect to the OM dated 28.1.2013 w.e.f. 1.1.2006 instead of 24.9.2012. The question whether or not the revised pension in terms of OM 28.1.2013 would be reduced proportionally would be examined once the order of the Hon S.C. in the RP to be filed against dismissal of SLP 21044/2014 is available ( para 12 above)
( emphasis added)
Sd. S.K. Makkar US
17.4.2015
Noting of Secy(P)
6. Thus the court ruling has become law of the land
7. Given the fact the review/curative petition in the same matter has once been dismissed by Hon. Apex Court, as also the fact that Civil Appeal of Ministry of Defence with which the SLPs in question got tagged, has also failed, there is no chance that a review petition may yield a different result. On the other hand this will not only engage the govt. machinery in uncessary litigation but will also result in attendant avoidable expenditure. ( emphasis added)
Sd. Alok Rawat Secy/ Pension
22.4.2015
Hon MOS(PP) Sd. 7.5.2015
Source:http://scm-bps.blogspot.in/2015/09/full-pension-for-those-with-less-than.html
Popular
Label List
- -BONUS ORDER
- 'BONUS
- AICPIN
- AIDEF
- AIR INDIA
- AIRF
- AITUC
- ALLOWANCE
- annual increment
- ARMY
- BANK EMPLOYEES
- BSNL
- cadre restructuring
- cadre review
- CBSE
- cgda
- CGHS
- CHILD CARE LEAVE
- children education allowance
- CONFEDERATION
- DA
- DC JCM
- DEARNESS ALLOWANCE
- dearness relief
- DOPT
- EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND
- EPFO
- FAMILY PENSION
- finmin
- FIXED MEDICAL ALLOWANCE
- GDS
- GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND
- GPF
- GRADE PAY
- HOLIDAY
- HOLIDAY HOMES
- HOUSE BUILDING ADVANCE
- HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE
- HRA
- INCOMETAX
- JCM
- JCM III
- KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA
- LEAVE TRAVEL CONCESSION
- LTC
- LTC 80 FARE
- LTC ADVANCE
- MACP
- MATERNITY LEAVE
- MAY DAY
- MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
- MINISTRY OF FINANCE
- MODIFIED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION
- NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE
- NATIONAL PENSION SCHEME
- NATIONAL PENSION SYSTEM
- NC JCM
- NEW PENSION SCHEME
- NIGHT DUTY ALLOWANCE
- NJCA
- OFB
- one rank one pension
- ONE RANK ONE PENSION.
- ORDINANCE FACTORY BOARD
- paternity leave
- pay fixation
- PCDA
- PENSION
- post offices
- POSTAL EMPLOYEES
- RAILWAY BOARD
- RAILWAY BONUS
- RAILWAY EMPLOYEES
- retirement
- retirement age
- revision of pension
- VRS
- WOMEN EMPLOYEES
Follow by Email
DISCLAIMER
The contents and information given in this blog are purely informative in nature and should not under any circumstances be taken as authority. All efforts had been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this (www.centralgovernmentemployees.com) blog. The same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. centralgovernmentemployees.com accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant departments and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. We cannot guarantee the availability linked pages at all times.
Post a Comment